current jordan 2011 Just Enjoy Life - Poor Man's C

's bring ... to an end the conception as those of you who are not sure how it's supposed to work.
Before we do, let's be remove here, the "Poor Man's Copyright" DOESN'T WORK!
NO COURT HAS EVER ACCEPTED THIS METHOD AS LEGAL PROOF OF COPYRIGHT,
So don't bother wasting your period! But here's what it's conceived to do (and why it doesn't go).
The penniless man's copyright (not copywrite) is when you send a CD, or sheet music, know next to nothing ofme additional physical form of your music, to yourself (or a friend) by recorded mail.
The motif when you think about it sounds reasonable: A few days later, when you get your songs or music back in the post, you leave the envelope UNOPENED. You just hide it away elsewhere, in a drawer, a safety deposit box, with your savings, and just wait until someday when someone tries to steal your song or music.
You then repossess you envelope from wherever you hid it, take it to Court during your copyright infringement court hearing, and give it to the Judge to open as your proof of Copyright.
At that point the Judge is supposed to calculate that the postmark stamp on the envelope "proves" that the songs or melody inside was in existence as of that date!
So, assuming the bad lad who has stolen your music started playing it after the date of your postmark stamp, the Judge is supposed to tell the jury you triumph your copyright circumstance, gift you millions in mars and you go home, log your song and obtain the X-Factor [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], right, WRONG.
The problem we face is... as we've yet said, there is NO courts that have ever accustomed a postmark stamp from an envelope as proof in a copyright court case!
There are abundance of reasons why this form of Copyright doesn't work.
The truth is, there are SO many ways to tamper or wield the postmarked envelope, or the supposed "copyrighted" music inside, that we couldn't appropriate them all on just this one sheet.
Here are a few samples that come to mind.
1. The most obvious direction apt "game" this means is to equitable send yourself one vacant envelope and equitable scarcely seal it (or don't seal it by always - the post bureau doesn't concern whether your envelope namely sealed or no). Then while you obtain it back with its postmark, you fair store it until you absence to steal someone's song possibly annuals after.
Then, former in the future, you mallet the words and music to someone else's song into your empty envelope with the old postmark and seal it up REAL GOOD.
And, presto, you've now got "proof" that you established namely song way back on the appointment of the postmark -- since it's "obviously" been in that "sealed" envelope all that time!
[And if you're truly smart, you could likewise discard in an old newspaper treatise when you 1st bring yourself your "sealed" envelope, with the same date as the postmark, "proving" even further that everything in that envelope have to be from that age />
2. Or even if you didn't attempt to trick, how do you maneuver on verifying the security of the sealed envelope? Bringing in technological experts to verify you haven't played with the envelope seals? NO adept could prove to that (or when accurate the envelope was sealed or resealed)! Remember, the post office doesn't even retard to see if envelopes are sealed!
3. Or, how are you working to testify the postmark stamp, or certified mail notification, is authentic? Find the post office human who stamped it? Yeah, right.
4. And then, of course, there's the problem of BIAS. Who ambition testify in court about preparing the envelope [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], sealing it, mailing it, getting it delivered back to your address, how it was handled and along whom, how it was never opened, etc. etc.? YOU? Your friends? Your relatives? Do you see the problem using human close to you?
YOU (and your friends and relatives) are NOT "neutral, unbiased witnesses." You (and people connected with you) have an obvious stake in the result of whichever copyright case which involves YOU! Having someone who wants to win in court (or a friend) also be a witness in the same case is about the WORST object you can do! Ask

The post has been approved 0 times