深圳人到港

旮詀�善誠禸億 �岆籵梠�腔儀
旮詀�善誠禸億 �岆籵梠�腔儀怮栠惆眕厘飲岆眅誠�奻旮詀禸億ㄛ劃鎗晞皊�蚚こㄛ筍郔輪婓旮誠壽諳�堤珋珨蠶蚳藷善眅誠禸億腔旮詀�ㄛ湮婦苤婦掖腔ㄛ祥岆靡齪畟督麼氪趙衒こㄛ奧岆蚐敆蓬棚﹜炴萍蚚こ睿茪嫁騷煨脹�都蚚こ﹝ 囀華填俶籵梠眒�醱惇楷ㄛ擂惆耋ㄛ甡擂醴ヶ誠啟勤�鏍啟颯薹ㄛ珨せ拻啃瑭汔誠莉蓬蚐婓誠忮歎殏磁�鏍啟拻萸嬝拻啋ㄛ奧婓旮詀閉庈腔歎跡岆鞠萸鞠啋˙旮詀憐粥眒梀善嬝褒珨跺ㄛ奧船祥嗣湮苤腔憐粥婓眅誠寀祥善ほ褒珨跺﹝奧奻漆衄覃脤珆尨ㄛ絞華閉庈腔炴�誘痺蚚こ掀眅誠肮濬莉こ幛�傖﹝ 跦擂弊模楷蜊巹郔陔腔苀數ㄛ奻堎�弊�坋珨笱妘こ笢輪匐傖歎跡奻梀ㄛ妘蚚蚐睿忣粕腔梀歎載岆儐�﹝弊模楷蜊巹啎數ㄛ踏爛腔籵梠薹蔚閉徹弊昢埏爛場秶隆啃煦眳�腔醴梓﹝☆呺斕端★﹜☆飪斕俙★﹜☆汸斕濂★﹜☆昒詢跁★﹜☆し朼欒★﹜☆蚐祥腕★脹鏡扴詢昜歎腔厙釐棵�祥剿蚇珋ㄛ涴虳悼梣覂拸鰓迵釓呫腔棵�ㄛ掖綴換湛堤珨跺笭猁腔捅洘ㄩ昜歎奻梀腔妗暱瑞玸撓綱飲蛌毆跤賸ぱ籵啃俷﹝ 囀華腔す歙�馱堈堈腴衾眅誠ㄛ筍�蚚こ歎跡�辦厒閉徹眅誠ㄛ蚕森褫獗囀華啃俷忳善腔籵梠揤薯衄嗣湮﹝涴珩植耜醱佽隴ㄛ峈朼欒囀華�珋婓摹衾痄鏍眅誠甜婓森華鎗滇﹝婓填俶籵億壩梠腔喳僻狟ㄛ囀華�陑腹雄ㄛ竭嗣�岊�极汜魂啃奻樓踝ㄛ淕跺扦頗腔恛隅擁岊嵺嵺褫峉﹝ 夥埜韻蹦鳶奻氝蚐籵梠橾誥淏侐揭岕�眳暱ㄛ衄夥埜��湮楷韻蹦ㄛ跤踡桲腔扦頗擁岊鳶奻氝蚐﹝弊模楷蜊巹蚳模隸腦圊�ヶ汒備ㄛ☆昜歎祥梀珩祥俴ㄛ笢弊憩呾梀侐坋爛珩裒祥奻藝弊腔昜歎★ㄛ☆醴ヶ笢弊祥湔婓籵億壩梠★﹝森逄珨堤ㄛ蚝�珨坒慾れロ笭檢ㄛ竘懂鏍潔腔慾轄毀粟﹝ む妗ㄛ涴弇夥源郘蚚腔垀彖冪撳悝模ㄛ謁鷓蟀藝弊飲羶�徹ㄛ瘁寀崋欒頗腕堤�森酸昄腔賦蹦ˋ藝弊萇ん莉こ掀笢弊晞皊勍嗣ㄛ肮紫棒苤イ陬掀笢弊歎跡腴ㄛイ蚐歎跡載岆腴螳ㄛ藝弊腔す歙滇歎掀笢弊珨盄傑庈腔滇歎祥眭猁晞皊嗣屾﹝珨模�諳婓藝弊ㄛ�彆斕祥堤�勛瘓ㄛ徹覂すす都都腔�赽ㄛ藩跺堎船祥嗣�啃藝啋憩劂賸﹝褫眕佽ㄛ珋踏笢弊湮傑庈腔昜歎阨す眒堈堈閉徹藝弊ㄛ睡斛猁豪侐坋爛ˋ 載湮腔恀枙岆ㄛ笢弊啃俷彶�睡奀夔裒奻藝弊�儸ˋ藝弊�す歙爛彶�婓侐祫拻勀藝啋ㄛ笢弊�爛傑淜準佌茠婓眥眥馱爛す歙馱訧符祥徹�勀�ロ啋�鏍啟酘衵ㄛ藝弊�馱船祥嗣岆笢弊�す歙馱訧腔坋捷﹝�歙彶�躺躺岆藝弊�坋煦眳珨腔笢弊啃俷ㄛ�猁創忳迵藝弊撓綱珨欴腔昜歎ㄛ啃俷汜魂蛹童眳笭褫砑奧眭﹝衄�佽ㄛ媼♀珨媼爛岆笢弊麵眕闐徹�腔珨耋熨ㄛ桽珋婓冪撳倛岊腔楷桯ㄛ涴笱褫夔俶俇�湔婓﹝
,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]The Court of Appeal pointed out that R and F's submission in the county court was of overt, conscious racism, and it was not prepared to find that there had been unconscious discrimination.The decisionThe Court of Appeal said that, unlike the ordinary civil claim where the judge decides, on the claimant's evidence only, whether the claimant has made out a case, in this case the judge had had the benefit of the whole of the evidence. Despite the school's failure to comply with the statutory requirements, the judge had been entitled to find on the basis of all the evidence that R and F had not proved racial discrimination.

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

The post has been approved 0 times